Advanced Plant Biotechnologies: Integrating Synthetic Seed Technology with Cryopreservation for Enhanced Germplasm Management

1. Introduction to Plant Propagation and Conservation Challenges

The sustainability of global agriculture and the preservation of plant biodiversity are critically dependent on effective propagation and conservation strategies. Traditional methods, while historically foundational, are increasingly challenged by modern environmental pressures and the imperative for large-scale, efficient plant production.

1.1. Traditional Plant Propagation and Conservation Methods: Limitations and Vulnerabilities

Conventional plant propagation methods, such as the use of natural seeds and vegetative reproduction (e.g., cuttings, tubers), present significant limitations. Natural seeds often exhibit low viability, poor germination rates, and are subject to seasonal dependencies, which collectively hinder efficient large-scale production. Furthermore, these methods can contribute to genetic erosion, where valuable genetic diversity within a species is lost over time.

Traditional ex situ conservation efforts, primarily through conventional seed banking, are not universally applicable. A substantial proportion of plant species, estimated to be over a third of critically endangered plants, are unsuitable for such storage. This includes species that produce few or no seeds, or those with “recalcitrant” seeds, which possess high moisture content and are sensitive to desiccation and freezing. Examples of such challenging species include many tropical fruit trees (e.g., Elaeis guineensis, Hevea brasiliensis), temperate forest trees (e.g., Juglans spp., Quercus spp.), and economically important food crops like banana, potato, and avocado. Conventional seed banks, while a pillar of plant conservation, cannot effectively safeguard these vulnerable categories.

Beyond seed banks, field genebanks, which maintain live plant collections, are inherently susceptible to irreversible germplasm loss due to pests, diseases, and environmental fluctuations, including those exacerbated by climate change. In vitro tissue culture, while offering the advantage of producing pathogen-free plantlets and enabling rapid multiplication in a confined space, is often labor-intensive and costly due to the necessity for frequent subculturing. Prolonged in vitro maintenance also carries an inherent risk of somaclonal variation, which refers to spontaneous genetic and phenotypic changes that can occur in plants regenerated from tissue culture, potentially compromising genetic uniformity.

1.2. The Imperative for Advanced Biotechnological Solutions

The confluence of increasing global population, rising demand for agricultural products, and severe environmental pressures—such as climate change, deforestation, and the alarming rate of biodiversity loss—underscores the urgent need for more robust, efficient, and reliable plant propagation and conservation strategies. The limitations of traditional methods create a significant gap in conservation efforts for a large and often economically or ecologically vital segment of plant biodiversity. These species, currently unbankable by conventional means, remain highly vulnerable to extinction, a risk amplified by accelerating environmental changes. This situation elevates the development of advanced biotechnological solutions from a mere improvement to an indispensable necessity for a substantial portion of the plant kingdom.

Plant biotechnology offers a powerful suite of tools to overcome these conventional limitations. It enables the mass multiplication of disease-free plants, facilitates precise genetic manipulation for crop improvement, and provides secure long-term germplasm storage. These advanced methods are crucial for safeguarding genetic diversity, ensuring future food security, and bolstering ecosystem resilience in a rapidly changing world.1

2. Synthetic Seed Technology: Principles and Production

Synthetic seed technology represents a significant advancement in plant propagation and conservation, offering a bridge between traditional seed-based methods and modern tissue culture techniques.

2.1. Definition and Core Principles of Synthetic Seeds

Synthetic seeds, also referred to as artificial seeds or synseeds, are an innovative biotechnological approach involving the artificial encapsulation of various plant propagules. These propagules can include somatic embryos, shoot buds, cell aggregates, or other meristematic tissues. The fundamental principle behind synthetic seed technology is to emulate the structure and function of a natural seed. This involves providing a protective coating that mimics a seed coat and a supportive internal environment that functions like an endosperm, supplying necessary nutrients and growth regulators. These encapsulated units are designed to retain their potential to develop into a whole plant under both in vitro (laboratory) and ex vitro (field) conditions, even after a period of storage.

The technology aims to combine the advantages of clonal (asexual) propagation, which ensures the genetic uniformity of the resulting plants, with the practical benefits associated with traditional seed propagation, such as ease of handling, storage, and transport. The concept of artificial seeds was first proposed by T. Murashige in 1974, and its initial successful developments were reported in carrot and alfalfa in the early 1980s.

2.2. Types of Synthetic Seeds

The development of synthetic seeds has diversified to address the varying physiological requirements of different plant species, leading to two primary types:

• Desiccated Synthetic Seeds: These are produced by encapsulating somatic embryos, which can be either naked or coated with materials like polyoxyethylene glycol. This encapsulation is followed by a controlled desiccation process, which involves removing moisture from the encapsulated propagules. Desiccation can be applied rapidly, such as by leaving artificial seeds in unsealed Petri dishes to dry overnight, or slowly, over a more controlled period of reducing relative humidity, often spanning days to weeks. This type of synthetic seed is primarily suitable for plant species whose somatic embryos naturally exhibit tolerance to desiccation.
• Hydrated Synthetic Seeds: In contrast, hydrated synthetic seeds are designed for plant species whose somatic embryos are recalcitrant and sensitive to desiccation, meaning they cannot tolerate drying without losing viability. These seeds are created by encapsulating a single somatic embryo or other propagule within a hydrogel capsule, with calcium alginate being the most commonly used material due to its favorable properties. The necessity for two fundamentally different types of synthetic seeds underscores a core biological challenge in plant conservation: the diverse and often opposing responses of plant material to water availability. This is not a universal problem with a single solution, but rather a complex issue requiring tailored approaches. The development of hydrated synthetic seeds is a direct response to the critical need to conserve recalcitrant species, which are otherwise excluded from conventional seed banking due to their inability to withstand drying. This strategic diversification of synthetic seed types significantly expands the scope of germplasm conservation to include a vast array of economically and ecologically important plants that were previously unbankable, highlighting the adaptability and responsiveness of biotechnological solutions to specific biological constraints.

2.3. Detailed Production Protocols

The production of synthetic seeds is a multi-step process that begins with the generation of suitable plant propagules and culminates in their encapsulation and preparation for storage or planting.

Somatic Embryogenesis (SE)

Somatic embryogenesis is the foundational step for producing the primary propagules, typically somatic embryos, used in synthetic seed technology. This process involves:

• Induction: Initiating embryogenesis from various explant tissues, such as callus cultures, immature flower buds, root tissue, nodal segments, shoot tips, or even isolated protoplasts. This induction typically occurs on a suitable culture medium supplemented with specific plant growth regulators, most notably auxins.
• Development: The somatic embryos then progress through distinct morphological stages, including globular, heart, and torpedo shapes, mimicking the early development of zygotic embryos.
• Maturation: This crucial stage involves the development of mature embryos with clearly defined root and shoot meristems and cotyledons. Successful maturation is critical for the subsequent conversion of these embryos into whole plantlets. However, inefficient or asynchronous maturation of somatic embryos remains a significant limitation in synthetic seed production. Somatic embryogenesis can occur directly from explanted tissues, leading to genetically identical clonal material, or indirectly through an undifferentiated callus phase, which carries a higher risk of somaclonal variation.

Encapsulation Techniques

Once mature somatic embryos or other propagules are obtained, they are encapsulated within a protective matrix.

• Coating Materials: The most commonly used encapsulating material is sodium alginate. Its popularity stems from its biocompatibility, relatively low cost, and its ability to form stable hydrogels when exposed to divalent cations like calcium. Other materials that have been explored include carrageenan, gum, polyoxyethylene (Polyox), potassium alginate, and sodium pectate.
• Dropping Method: This is the most widely adopted and practical encapsulation system. It involves suspending somatic embryos or other propagules in a sodium alginate solution. This mixture is then carefully dripped into a complexing solution, typically calcium chloride, which causes the alginate to polymerize and form firm, spherical beads (usually 4-5 mm in diameter) around the explant. Critical parameters for success include the polymerization time (e.g., 20-30 minutes) and the speed of agitation on a gyratory shaker.
• Molding Method: An alternative technique involves mixing somatic embryos with a temperature-dependent gel, such as gelrite or agar, and then cutting the semi-solidified gel into desired shapes.

Incorporation of Adjuvants

The encapsulation matrix is not merely a protective shell; it can be enriched with various beneficial substances to function as an “artificial endosperm.” This includes essential nutrients (e.g., components of Murashige and Skoog medium), plant growth regulators (e.g., BAP, IAA), pesticides, fungicides (e.g., bavistin, streptomycin), and even activated charcoal. These adjuvants play a crucial role in supporting the germination, conversion, and overall vigor of the encapsulated propagule, and can also provide protection against pathogens. This suggests that synthetic seeds function as self-contained micro-ecosystems, actively supporting the early developmental stages of the encapsulated propagule. This goes beyond passive protection, enabling the optimization of growth and survival by providing tailored biochemical cues and environmental buffering. This capability is crucial for compensating for the inherent weaknesses of in vitro-derived somatic embryos, such as their often “weaker plantlets” compared to zygotic embryos or their “lack of dormancy and stress tolerance”. This transforms the synthetic seed into a sophisticated delivery system designed for optimal early plant development and transition to ex vitro conditions.

Optimization Factors

The success of synthetic seed production is highly dependent on the meticulous optimization of several factors. These include the concentration of the polymer (e.g., 3-4% sodium alginate), the concentration of the complexing agent (e.g., 100 mM CaCl2), the curing time, and the resulting physical properties (e.g., firmness, uniformity, clarity) of the beads.

2.4. Advantages of Synthetic Seed Technology (in isolation)

Synthetic seed technology, even when considered independently of cryopreservation, offers a multitude of advantages over conventional propagation methods:

• Ease of Handling and Transport: Synthetic seeds are compact, durable, and significantly easier to handle during storage and transportation compared to live plantlets. This facilitates the safe and efficient exchange of germplasm across national and international borders, bypassing the bulk and stringent quarantine issues associated with transporting whole plants.
• Storage Potential: They offer a viable option for short- and medium-term storage without significant loss of viability. This is often achieved at refrigerated temperatures, typically between 4-6°C, extending the shelf life of propagules.
• Genetic Uniformity: As synthetic seeds are typically derived from somatic cells through clonal propagation, they ensure the genetic uniformity of the resulting plants. This characteristic is paramount for maintaining elite varieties and preserving specific gene combinations, which is often challenging with sexually reproduced seeds due to genetic recombination.
• Economical Mass Propagation: The technology enables the cost-effective, large-scale propagation of elite plant varieties, including those that are difficult to reproduce conventionally or do not produce viable seeds (e.g., seedless fruits, certain ornamental plants).
• Direct Field Delivery: Synthetic seeds can be sown directly in fields or greenhouses, eliminating the labor-intensive and costly step of transplanting in vitro-grown plantlets, thus streamlining the production process.
• Pathogen-Free Material: Produced under aseptic tissue culture conditions, synthetic seeds are inherently pathogen-free. This is a significant advantage for disease management in agricultural systems and facilitates the safe international exchange of germplasm without the risk of spreading plant diseases.

2.5. Limitations of Synthetic Seed Technology (in isolation)

Despite its numerous advantages, synthetic seed technology faces several limitations that currently hinder its widespread commercial application:

• Low Survival and Germination Rates: A primary challenge is the often-low survival and conversion (germination) rates of somatic embryos for many plant species. This issue is frequently linked to inefficient or asynchronous maturation of somatic embryos, where not all embryos develop uniformly or to a stage capable of successful germination.
• Lack of Dormancy and Stress Tolerance: Unlike natural seeds, which possess inherent dormancy mechanisms and robust stress tolerance, somatic embryos often lack these crucial traits. This physiological difference makes their long-term storage challenging without specialized environmental conditions.
• Coating Material Challenges: The encapsulating material itself can pose limitations. Some coating materials dry out quickly when exposed to ambient conditions, compromising the viability of the encapsulated propagule. Furthermore, the optimal concentration of the coating material is a critical limiting factor; it must be permeable enough to allow the embryo to emerge and grow, while also providing necessary nutrients and protection. In some cases, somatic embryos may not be able to physically emerge from the capsule, hindering their development into normal plants.
• Limited Protocols and Explant Availability: There is a current paucity of standardized or widely available protocols for reliably producing propagules from all desired plant parts or for all economically important species using plant tissue culture methods. This limits the range of useful starting material available for synthetic seed production.
• Cost of Production: While the technology aims for a low cost per plantlet in mass production, the initial research and development (R&D) and optimization phases can be significantly costly. This upfront investment can be a barrier to widespread adoption.
• Mismatch with Farm Machinery: The size and shape of synthetic seeds may not always be compatible with existing farm machinery designed for conventional seeds. This incompatibility can pose a practical hurdle for large-scale mechanized planting and widespread agricultural integration.

3. Cryopreservation: Principles and Techniques for Plant Material

Cryopreservation is a sophisticated and increasingly vital method for the long-term conservation of biological materials, particularly plant genetic resources, by leveraging ultra-low temperatures.

3.1. Definition and Fundamental Principles of Cryopreservation

Cryopreservation refers to the process of preserving biological materials, including plant cells, tissues, organs, and various propagules, by cooling them to extremely low temperatures. This typically involves storage in liquid nitrogen (LN) at -196°C or in its vapor phase, which ranges from -150°C to -195°C.

At these cryogenic temperatures, all biological activity, including cellular division, metabolic processes, and biochemical reactions that lead to cell degradation or death, is effectively halted.6 This state of “suspended animation” allows for theoretically indefinite preservation without significant changes to the material’s viability or genetic integrity.

The core principle underpinning successful cryopreservation is the prevention of lethal intracellular ice crystal formation during both the freezing and thawing processes. Ice crystals can cause severe mechanical damage to cellular structures and membranes, leading to cell death. This is primarily achieved by removing freezable water from the tissues, either through physical dehydration (e.g., air drying) or osmotic dehydration induced by specialized chemicals known as cryoprotective agents (CPAs). The ultimate goal in many protocols is to induce vitrification, a process where the aqueous milieu of the cells solidifies into a non-crystalline, glassy phase, thereby avoiding ice formation entirely.

3.2. Key Cryopreservation Techniques for Plant Material

Several techniques have been developed to achieve successful cryopreservation, each tailored to different plant materials and species:

• Slow Freezing (Controlled Freezing / Two-step Freezing): This traditional method involves gradually cooling the plant material, typically at a rate of 0.5-2°C per minute, to an intermediate sub-zero temperature (e.g., -40°C) before rapid immersion in liquid nitrogen. This controlled cooling allows water to move out of the cells before intracellular ice can form. While effective for some species, this method often requires expensive programmable freezers to precisely control the cooling rate.
• Vitrification: This rapid cooling technique transforms cell suspensions or tissues directly from an aqueous phase into a glassy, non-crystalline solid state by direct exposure to liquid nitrogen. Vitrification requires high concentrations of cryoprotective agents (40-60% w/v) and extremely rapid cooling to prevent ice nucleation. It is generally a fast process, often completed in less than 10 minutes, and can be relatively inexpensive as it does not necessarily require specialized freezing machines.
• Encapsulation-Dehydration: This method combines the protective benefits of encapsulation with a controlled dehydration step. Explants are typically encapsulated, often in calcium alginate beads, then precultured in a liquid medium containing high concentrations of sucrose. Following preculture, the encapsulated material is partially desiccated (e.g., by air drying in a laminar flow cabinet or over silica gel) to a low moisture content before direct immersion in liquid nitrogen. A notable advantage of this technique is its ability to reduce the reliance on potentially toxic cryoprotective agents.
• Encapsulation-Vitrification: This approach represents a hybrid technique that integrates the protective benefits of encapsulation with the ice-preventing mechanism of vitrification, aiming to combine the strengths of both methods for enhanced survival.
• Droplet Vitrification: A refinement of the vitrification technique, this method involves placing small drops of cryoprotective agent-treated explants onto aluminum foil strips, which are then rapidly plunged into liquid nitrogen. This small volume and high surface area facilitate extremely rapid cooling rates.
• Desiccation Technique: This method involves the physical removal of water from plant material, such as somatic embryos, synthetic seeds, or embryonic axes, either under an airflow cabinet or over silica gel. It is considered a simple and easy-to-handle technique, often tried first due to its straightforward nature. The optimal moisture content for cryopreservation using this method typically ranges from 8% to 20%, with a desiccation time usually between 1 to 2 hours, depending on the explant type and species.
• D-Cryo-Plate Method: In this technique, shoot tips or buds are attached to specialized cryo-plates and then dehydrated, often after a loading treatment with glycerol and sucrose solution, before being subjected to ultra-low temperatures.

3.3. Cryoprotective Agents (CPAs)

Cryoprotective agents (CPAs) are chemical compounds crucial for mitigating freezing injury during cryopreservation. These fluids reduce the amount of ice formed at a given temperature and should ideally be biologically acceptable, capable of penetrating cells, and exhibit low toxicity. CPAs are generally categorized into two main types:

• Cell Membrane-Permeating CPAs: These agents can cross the cell membrane and act intracellularly. Common examples include dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), glycerol, and 1,2-propanediol (propylene glycol). Glycerol, discovered in 1949, is a polyol compound widely used for storing bacteria and animal sperm, as it reduces electrolyte concentration in the unfrozen solution around a cell. DMSO, first synthesized in 1866, is frequently employed for cryopreservation of cultured mammalian cells due to its relatively low cost and cytotoxicity. However, it can cause a decline in survival rates and induce cell differentiation through DNA methylation and histone alteration, posing challenges for routine clinical use.
• Non-Membrane-Permeating CPAs: These agents typically remain outside the cell, influencing the extracellular environment. Examples include 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol, various polymers such as polyvinyl pyrrolidone, hydroxyethyl starch, polyethylene glycol (PEG), and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), as well as sugars like sucrose and trehalose. Polymers can decrease the size of ice crystals, while proteins like sericin (from silkworm cocoons) and small antifreeze proteins from marine teleosts are also being investigated for their cryoprotective properties. A widely used cryoprotectant solution in plant vitrification protocols is Plant Vitrification Solution-2 (PVS2), which typically comprises a mixture of glycerol, ethylene glycol, DMSO, and sucrose. The paradox of cryoprotectants is that while they are essential for preventing ice damage and osmotic shock, their high concentrations can be toxic to cells. This necessitates careful optimization of their concentration, exposure time, and subsequent removal protocols for each species and tissue type. This highlights a fundamental balancing act in cryopreservation, where the solution to one problem (ice formation) introduces another (chemical toxicity), requiring precise scientific calibration.

3.4. Major Steps in Cryopreservation Procedure

A typical cryopreservation procedure involves a sequence of critical steps to ensure the viability of the biological material:

1. Pre-treatment and CPA Mixing: Cells or tissues are prepared and then mixed with appropriate cryoprotective agents before cooling.
2. Cooling and Storage: The treated cells or tissues are cooled to ultra-low temperatures, usually by direct immersion in liquid nitrogen or through controlled-rate freezing, and then stored.
3. Warming: When needed, the cryopreserved samples are rapidly warmed, often in a water bath, to minimize ice recrystallization and osmotic shock during thawing.
4. CPA Removal: After thawing, the cryoprotective agents are carefully removed from the cells or tissues to prevent their toxic effects at physiological temperatures.

3.5. Challenges and Drawbacks of Cryopreservation (in isolation)

Despite its immense potential, cryopreservation faces several significant challenges and drawbacks:

• Cellular Damage during Cooling and Thawing: The primary challenge is assuring minimal damage to biological cells during the cooling and warming processes. This damage, known as cryoinjury, is associated with water phase changes, including lethal intracellular ice crystal formation, osmotic shock due from concentrated solutes, and membrane damage.
• Cryoprotective Agent Toxicity: As discussed, CPAs themselves can be damaging to cells, particularly at high concentrations. For instance, DMSO, a common CPA, may alter chromosome stability and potentially lead to a risk of tumor formation in certain cell types.
• Genetic Drift and Epigenetic Changes: While cryopreservation generally maintains genetic stability due to the cessation of metabolic activity, some minor genetic drift or epigenetic changes (alterations in gene expression without DNA sequence change) can occur, although these are typically less significant than those observed with prolonged in vitro subcultures.
• Contamination Risk: Certain cryopreservation methods, particularly vitrification, carry a higher potential for contamination with pathogenic agents due to the open system often employed.
• Species-Specific Optimization and Reproducibility: Cryopreservation protocols are highly species-specific, and effective procedures must be tailor-made for each plant species or even cultivar. This leads to a reproducibility gap, where successful protocols in one laboratory may be difficult to transfer and validate in others due to variations in laboratory supplies, equipment, and the technical skills of personnel. This means that translating laboratory success into broad application requires more robust, standardized, and user-friendly protocols.
• Initial Investment Costs: Implementing cryopreservation practices requires a significant initial technological investment for specialized equipment, such as programmable freezers (for slow freezing) and liquid nitrogen storage facilities.

The selection of a cryopreservation protocol often involves a strategic decision, balancing factors like cost, speed, and the risk of injury. For example, vitrification is fast and can be inexpensive as it avoids the need for specialized freezing machines, but it may carry a higher contamination risk and requires advanced manipulation skills. Conversely, slow freezing, while potentially more expensive due to equipment needs, may have a lower contamination risk and be easier to manipulate. This highlights that choosing a cryopreservation protocol is a multi-criteria optimization problem, tailored to the specific plant material, available resources, and desired outcomes.

4. Synergy: Integrating Synthetic Seed Technology with Cryopreservation

The integration of synthetic seed technology with cryopreservation offers a powerful and complementary approach to plant genetic resource management, addressing many limitations of individual techniques.

4.1. The Combined Approach: Enhancing Conservation and Propagation

The combined application of synthetic seed technology and cryopreservation leverages the strengths of both methods to achieve superior outcomes in plant conservation and propagation. Synthetic seeds provide a standardized, encapsulated unit that can be easily handled and transported, while cryopreservation offers the capability for indefinite, ultra-low temperature storage. This synergistic approach enables the long-term conservation of valuable plant germplasm, particularly for species that are difficult to store using conventional methods, such as those with recalcitrant seeds or those typically propagated vegetatively.

This combined technology provides a “layered protection” mechanism. The encapsulation matrix not only offers mechanical protection and a nutritive micro-environment for the propagule but also actively prepares the tissue for the extreme cold of cryopreservation by facilitating the uptake of cryoprotectants and controlled dehydration. This synergistic layering enhances survival and genetic stability, particularly for delicate propagules like somatic embryos or shoot tips. The capsule, therefore, is not merely a delivery mechanism but an active participant in stress mitigation, preparing the tissue for the extreme cold and supporting its recovery post-thaw.

4.2. Methodologies for Cryopreservation of Synthetic Seeds

The cryopreservation of synthetic seeds primarily employs techniques that focus on minimizing intracellular ice formation and maximizing cell viability.

• Encapsulation-Dehydration: This is a prominent method applied to synthetic seeds. It involves encapsulating explants (such as somatic embryos, shoot tips, or nodal segments) in alginate beads. These encapsulated propagules are then precultured in a liquid medium containing high concentrations of sucrose to induce osmotic dehydration. Following preculture, they undergo partial physical desiccation, often by air drying in a laminar flow cabinet or over silica gel, to further reduce their moisture content. Finally, the desiccated beads are directly immersed in liquid nitrogen for long-term storage. A key advantage of this technique is its ability to induce dehydration tolerance, thereby reducing the reliance on potentially toxic cryoprotective agents.
• Encapsulation-Vitrification: This hybrid technique combines the protective benefits of encapsulation with the vitrification approach. The encapsulated propagules are treated with highly concentrated cryoprotective solutions (e.g., PVS2) to induce a glassy state upon rapid cooling in liquid nitrogen, preventing ice crystal formation.
• Other Vitrification-based Protocols: Beyond encapsulation-vitrification, other vitrification-based protocols, such as droplet vitrification and the D or V cryo-plate methods, can also be adapted for the cryopreservation of synthetic seeds or the explants contained within them. These methods aim for ultra-rapid cooling to achieve vitrification.

4.3. Advantages of the Combined Technology

The integration of synthetic seed technology and cryopreservation yields a comprehensive set of advantages for plant genetic resource management:

• Long-term Germplasm Conservation: This combined approach enables the virtually indefinite storage of plant genetic material without loss of viability or genetic modification. At liquid nitrogen temperatures (-196°C), cellular metabolism is effectively halted, ensuring the long-term preservation of elite genotypes and endangered species.
• Genetic Stability and Uniformity: By preserving clonally propagated material (somatic embryos, shoot tips), the technology ensures the genetic uniformity of the resulting plants. It also significantly reduces the risk of somaclonal variation, which can occur during prolonged in vitro subculture, thereby maintaining the genetic integrity of valuable lines.
• Enhanced Handling and Transport: Synthetic seeds, being small, uniform, and encapsulated, are easy to handle, package, and transport. This greatly facilitates the international exchange of pathogen-free germplasm, bypassing the logistical complexities and quarantine restrictions associated with live plant material.
• Disease-Free Propagation: The production of synthetic seeds under aseptic tissue culture conditions ensures that the encapsulated propagules are free from pathogens. This is a critical advantage for establishing healthy plantations and preventing the spread of plant diseases.
• Cost and Space Efficiency: Cryopreservation requires a significantly smaller volume of material for storage compared to traditional field or in vitro collections. While the initial investment for cryopreservation facilities can be substantial, the long-term maintenance costs are considerably lower (e.g., $1-2 per year per sample after initial setup, compared to frequent subculturing costs). This represents a substantial long-term economic advantage, making it a sustainable investment for large-scale germplasm banks and commercial operations over decades.
• Conservation of Difficult-to-Store Species: This combined technology is particularly impactful for species that cannot be effectively conserved through conventional seed banking, such as those with recalcitrant seeds (high water content, desiccation-sensitive), vegetatively propagated crops, or rare and endangered species. Synthetic seeds provide a “seed-like” unit for these species, which can then be cryopreserved, effectively expanding the scope of ex situ conservation to a vast array of previously unbankable biodiversity, thereby filling the “conservation gap” identified earlier. For tree breeding, cryopreservation of embryogenic lines (often encapsulated) allows indefinite storage of juvenile material while clones are field-tested. Once superior genotypes are identified, they can be propagated from the cryostock, bypassing the long juvenile phase of mature trees. This provides a strategic advantage in forestry and horticulture, accelerating breeding cycles and ensuring access to elite, genetically stable material.

4.4. Challenges and Limitations of the Combined Technology

Despite its significant advantages, the integrated synthetic seed and cryopreservation technology faces several challenges that require ongoing research and development:

• Low Survival/Regeneration Rates: Achieving consistently high survival and regeneration rates of plantlets from cryopreserved synthetic seeds remains a major hurdle for many plant species. This is often exacerbated by the inherent lack of dormancy and stress tolerance in somatic embryos compared to natural seeds.
• Species-Specific Optimization: Cryopreservation protocols are highly sensitive and species-specific. Each plant species, and sometimes even different genotypes within a species, requires extensive optimization of pre-treatment, cryoprotectant type and concentration, cooling and warming rates, and regeneration conditions to achieve acceptable viability. This laborious optimization process limits broad applicability and scaling.
• Technical Complexity and Skill Requirements: The procedures involved in both synthetic seed production and cryopreservation are technically complex and labor-intensive. They require specialized tissue culture skills, meticulous manipulation, and highly trained personnel, which can be a barrier to widespread adoption, particularly in resource-limited settings.
• Initial Investment and Commercialization Hurdles: While long-term maintenance costs are low, the initial investment required for establishing cryopreservation facilities and optimizing species-specific protocols can be substantial. Furthermore, challenges related to consistent production of high-quality propagules, lack of dormancy in some somatic embryos, and compatibility with farm machinery hinder large-scale commercialization.
• Genetic and Epigenetic Stability Concerns: Although cryopreservation is generally considered to maintain genetic stability, some studies indicate that minor genetic or epigenetic changes can occur in cryopreserved material, although these are typically less pronounced than those observed with prolonged in vitro subcultures. Continuous monitoring and validation are necessary to ensure the genetic integrity of conserved germplasm.

4.5. Case Studies and Successful Applications

Despite the challenges, the combined synthetic seed and cryopreservation technology has demonstrated significant success across a range of plant species, particularly for those difficult to conserve by conventional means.

• Zephyranthes (Rain Lilies): A notable success story involves the Zephyranthes species. A study successfully established a method for embryo rescue and long-term storage of Zephyranthes embryos using the encapsulation-dehydration method, which effectively functioned as an artificial seed. This protocol achieved impressive post-cryopreservation viability rates of 54% for Z. grandiflora and 48% for Z. atamasca after 2 hours of dehydration, demonstrating its potential for germplasm conservation in floriculture.
• Myrtus communis L. (Myrtle): Research has successfully applied synthetic seed production and cryopreservation to Myrtus communis L. genotypes. Encapsulated shoot tips of myrtle showed high plant conversion rates of 70-75% after long-term cryopreservation at -196°C, highlighting the robustness of this method for conserving valuable genotypes.
• Woody Species: Cryopreservation of embryogenic material from woody species has seen increasing success.

• Conifers: Slow cooling methods are predominantly used for species like Maritime Pine (Pinus pinaster), Norway Spruce (Picea abies), Serbian Spruce (Picea omorika), White Spruce (Picea glauca), Japanese Cedar (Cryptomeria japonica), and Radiata Pine (Pinus radiata), with successful recovery rates reported.
• Fruit Species: Vitrification-based techniques, including encapsulation-dehydration, have shown success in Citrus species (Citrus sinensis, C. deliciosa), coffee (Coffea arabica, C. canephora), olive (Olea europaea), avocado (Persea americana), grapevine (Vitis vinifera), and cocoa (Theobroma cacao).
• Deciduous Forest Species: Vitrification or desiccation methods have been applied to species like European Chestnut (Castanea sativa), Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur), Cork Oak (Quercus suber), White Oak (Quercus alba), Holm Oak (Quercus ilex), Horse-chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum), and Paradise Tree (Melia azedarach), yielding promising recovery rates.
• Palm Tree Species: Encapsulation-dehydration and droplet vitrification are common for species such as Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis), Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera), and Coconut (Cocos nucifera), with high recovery percentages.

• Other Examples: The technology has been successfully applied to a diverse range of other plant species, including carrot, alfalfa, pear, potato, cassava, sugarcane, sorghum, hybrid rice, various orchids, and numerous medicinal plants. These applications span from mass propagation to the conservation of endangered species and the production of disease-free planting material.

5. Future Perspectives and Broader Implications

The combined synthetic seed and cryopreservation technology is at the forefront of plant biotechnology, with continuous advancements promising to expand its utility and impact across various sectors.

5.1. Recent Advancements and Innovations

Ongoing research is focused on refining existing protocols and exploring novel approaches to enhance the efficiency and applicability of this integrated technology:

• Improved Cryoprotectants and Encapsulation Materials: Efforts are underway to develop new cryoprotective agents that are less toxic and more effective, including the exploration of nanoparticles (e.g., gold, silver, zinc oxide, iron oxide) and proteins (e.g., sericin, antifreeze proteins) to improve cryopreservation outcomes and enhance cell viability. Innovations in encapsulation materials, such as self-breaking gel beads, are also being investigated to improve germination rates and ease of emergence.
• Automation and High-Throughput Systems: To overcome the labor-intensive nature and technical complexity, research is progressing towards automating various steps in synthetic seed production and cryopreservation. This includes automated encapsulation processes and high-throughput systems for handling and seeding, which are crucial for scaling up commercial production and reducing costs.
• Omics Technologies and Molecular Tools: The integration of “omics” technologies (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics) and other molecular tools is crucial for a deeper understanding of the molecular processes underlying plant freezing tolerance and for addressing issues of genetic instability. These tools provide insights into cellular responses to cryopreservation-induced stresses, guiding the development of more robust protocols.
• CRISPR Gene Editing Integration: A promising future direction involves combining synthetic seeds with advanced genome editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9. This integration allows for targeted genetic modifications within the propagules before encapsulation and cryopreservation, enabling the enhancement of desirable traits such as increased yield, improved stress tolerance (e.g., to abiotic stresses like drought or salinity), and disease resistance. This offers a powerful avenue for developing new plant varieties with enhanced resilience and productivity.

5.2. Economic and Commercial Prospects

The economic and commercial prospects of synthetic seed technology combined with cryopreservation are substantial, particularly given the increasing global challenges in agriculture and conservation. This technology offers a cost-effective alternative for the mass propagation of elite plant genotypes, potentially replacing expensive F1 hybrids in certain crops. The ability to directly deliver encapsulated propagules to the field reduces labor and acclimatization steps, further lowering production costs.

The technology is particularly valuable for high-value crops where conventional seed production is impractical or yields are low, such as seedless fruits (e.g., watermelon, grapes), certain ornamental hybrids, and medicinal plants. It also holds immense commercial potential for forestry, enabling the rapid multiplication and long-term storage of elite tree genotypes, accelerating breeding cycles, and supporting sustainable forest management. The long-term cost-effectiveness of cryopreservation, despite high initial investment, positions it as a sustainable economic model for large-scale germplasm banks over decades.

5.3. Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

As with any advanced biotechnology, the commercialization and widespread adoption of synthetic seed technology with cryopreservation raise important regulatory and ethical considerations. These include intellectual property (IP) rights, antitrust concerns related to market consolidation by a few large companies controlling seed technology, and contractual terms that might extend patent rights beyond their intended scope.

Ethical debates also surround the potential for genetic contamination, particularly in the context of “terminator seeds” that produce sterile offspring, forcing farmers into annual purchases and potentially reducing plant diversity. While synthetic seeds are designed to be true-to-type clones, the broader implications of genetically modified propagules and their interaction with wild relatives require careful regulatory oversight. Transparent policies and robust ethical guidelines are essential to ensure equitable access, prevent monopolistic practices, and safeguard both agricultural ecosystems and global biodiversity.

5.4. Broader Implications for Agriculture, Forestry, and Biodiversity Conservation

The combined synthetic seed and cryopreservation technology carries profound implications for addressing some of the most pressing global challenges:

• Food Security: By enabling the mass propagation of elite, disease-free, and potentially genetically enhanced crop varieties, this technology can significantly boost agricultural productivity and contribute to global food security.
• Agrobiodiversity and Climate Resilience: It provides a robust method for conserving the genetic diversity of crops and wild relatives, including those with recalcitrant seeds or difficult propagation methods, thereby enhancing resilience to changing climate conditions and disease outbreaks.
• Ecosystem Restoration and Forestry: The technology is a valuable tool for the conservation and reintroduction of rare, threatened, and endangered plant species, aiding in ecosystem restoration efforts and supporting sustainable forestry practices by preserving valuable forest genetic resources.
• Breeding Programs: The ability to store juvenile embryogenic lines indefinitely allows breeders to preserve valuable genetic material while conducting extensive field testing, accelerating the development and deployment of superior genotypes.

6. Conclusions

Synthetic seed technology, when integrated with cryopreservation, represents a powerful and indispensable biotechnological advancement for plant propagation and genetic resource conservation. This combined approach addresses critical limitations inherent in traditional methods, particularly for species with recalcitrant seeds or those that are vegetatively propagated, thereby filling a significant “conservation gap” in global efforts.

The synergistic benefits are multifaceted: synthetic seeds provide a standardized, protective, and nutritive micro-environment, while cryopreservation ensures indefinite, genetically stable storage at ultra-low temperatures. This layered protection enhances the survival and genetic integrity of delicate propagules, offering unparalleled long-term viability. Economically, despite initial investments, the long-term maintenance costs are significantly lower than conventional in vitro or field collections, positioning this technology as a sustainable solution. Furthermore, its capacity for mass propagation of elite, pathogen-free genotypes and its potential for direct field delivery streamline agricultural practices.

While challenges persist, including the need for species-specific protocol optimization, overcoming technical complexities, and navigating commercialization hurdles, ongoing innovations are rapidly addressing these limitations. Advancements in cryoprotectants, automation, molecular tools, and the integration of genome editing technologies are poised to unlock the full potential of this combined approach. The trajectory of this technology points towards a future where it plays a central role in ensuring global food security, preserving agrobiodiversity in the face of climate change, supporting sustainable forestry, and enabling the reintroduction of endangered species, thereby safeguarding the plant kingdom for future generations.

Works cited

1. Review on Production and Application of Synthetic Seeds – Global Scientific Journal, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/Review_on_Production_and_Application_of_Synthetic_SeedsReview_on_Production_and_Application_of_Synthetic_Seeds.pdf
2. Exploring the potential of synthetic seeds: Influence of explant, encapsulating agent and matrix, advantages and challenges, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://horizonepublishing.com/journals/index.php/PST/article/download/3931/5287/39554
3. Synthetic Seeds – Just Agriculture, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://justagriculture.in/files/newsletter/2022/august/51.%20Synthetic%20Seeds.pdf
4. Perspectives and Prospects of Artificial Seed Production in Crop Plants, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://rfppl.co.in/subscription/upload_pdf/nand-lal-sir,-iab–06.03.-1741241730.pdf
5. An Introduction to the Cryopreservation of Clonally Propagated Plants, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://colostate.pressbooks.pub/clonalcryopreservation/chapter/an-introduction-to-the-cryopreservation-of-clonally-propagated-plants/
6. Review. The use of cryopreservation for germplasm conservation of vegetatively propagated crops – ResearchGate, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271189896_Review_The_use_of_cryopreservation_for_germplasm_conservation_of_vegetatively_propagated_crops
7. Cryopreservation is not sci-fi. It may save plants from extinction – Science News, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.sciencenews.org/article/cryopreservation-plants-extinction
8. Current status of the cryopreservation of embryogenic material of woody species – PMC, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10828030/
9. Cryopreservation | Conservation Module – CGIAR Genebanks, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://genebanks.cgiar.org/the-platform/conservation-module/cryopreservation/
10. Artificial Seed Production and Cryopreservation | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267353789_Artificial_Seed_Production_and_Cryopreservation
11. Synthetic Seeds: Prospects and Advances in Cryopreservation …, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337474945_Synthetic_Seeds_Prospects_and_Advances_in_Cryopreservation
12. Synthetic seed production of medicinal plants: a review on influence of explants, encapsulation agent and matrix | Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO) | US EPA, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://hero.epa.gov/hero/index.cfm/reference/details/reference_id/7400115
13. labassociates.com, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://labassociates.com/what-is-synthetic-seed-technology#:~:text=Synthetic%20seed%20technology%20primarily%20involves,this%20potential%20even%20after%20storage.
14. Artificial seeds and Cryopreservation.pptx – SlideShare, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/artificial-seeds-and-cryopreservation-pptx/272621754
15. (PDF) ARTIFICIAL SEEDS TECHNOLOGY: A REVIEW – ResearchGate, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377115126_ARTIFICIAL_SEEDS_TECHNOLOGY_A_REVIEW
16. Synthetic Seeds: Definition and Applications – Plant Cell Technology, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://plantcelltechnology.com/blogs/blog/blogsynthetic-seeds-definition-and-applications
17. (PDF) Synthetic seed: An overview – ResearchGate, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375998338_Synthetic_seed_An_overview
18. Pros and Cons of Synthetic Seeds – Plant Cell Technology, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://plantcelltechnology.com/blogs/blog/blog-pros-and-cons-of-synthetic-seeds
19. Somatic embryogenesis and artificial seed production | PPT – SlideShare, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/somatic-embryogenesis-and-artificial-seed-production-121235662/121235662
20. Synthetic Seed PPT | Synthetic Seed Notes & PDF Download – Agrobotany, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.agrobotany.in/2023/09/Synthetic-Seed.html
21. Synthetic Seeds | PPT – SlideShare, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/synthetic-seeds-150580081/150580081
22. Synthetic seeds are defined as artificially encapsulated somatic – Biotica Publications, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://bioticapublications.com/journal-backend/articlePdf/c0c77a5d4c.pdf
23. Medium- and Long-Term Conservation of Ornamental Plants Using …, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337477746_Medium-_and_Long-Term_Conservation_of_Ornamental_Plants_Using_Synthetic_Seed_Technology
24. horticulturejournal.usamv.ro, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://horticulturejournal.usamv.ro/pdf/2023/issue_2/Art71.pdf
25. Synthetic Seed Technology in Horticultural Crops for Conservation and Utilisation of Germplasm – International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://ijair.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/publications/IJAIR_3275_FINAL.pdf
26. Synthetic seed: An overview – ResearchGate, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nareshkumar-Jayewar/publication/375998338_Synthetic_seed_An_overview/links/6566c402ce88b870311d0e6b/Synthetic-seed-An-overview.pdf?origin=scientificContributions
27. Synthetic Seeds: Innovation in Plant Propagation and Conservation …, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391858835_Synthetic_Seeds_Innovation_in_Plant_Propagation_and_Conservation_for_Sustainable_Agriculture
28. Production of Synthetic Seeds by Encapsulating Asexual Embryos of Carrot – ASHS Journals, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://journals.ashs.org/view/journals/jashs/110/2/article-p277.pdf
29. RESEARCH ON THE USE OF SYNTHETIC SEED IN CONSERVATION OF KALANCHOE BLOSSFELDIANA – Scientific Papers Series B Horticulture, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.horticulturejournal.usamv.ro/pdf/2021/issue_1/Art106.pdf
30. Somatic embryogenesis The sporophytic generation of a plant is initiated with the zygote, which is the initial cell (product of, accessed on May 22, 2025, http://eagri.org/eagri50/GPBR311/lec16.pdf
31. Somatic embryogenesis and cryopreservation of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) – PEARL, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?params=/context/fose-theses-other/article/1350/&path_info=2014Al_20Shamari10216767phd.pdf.pdf
32. The recent applications of artificial seeds on different types of plants. – ResearchGate, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-recent-applications-of-artificial-seeds-on-different-types-of-plants_tbl1_320845889
33. ARTIFICIAL SEEDS – M.U.C. Women’s College, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.mucwcburdwan.org/images/uploads/Purba%20Konar%202020.pdf
34. Synthetic Seed Technology Development and Production Studies for Storage, Transport, and Industrialization of Bracken Spores – MDPI, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/9/1079
35. Embryo Rescue via Artificial Seed Technique and Long-Term …, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=121352
36. Somatic Embryogenesis and Production of Artificial Seeds as a Tool for Micropropagation in ‘Guava’ (Psidium guajava L.), accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.ijcmas.com/special/11/M.%20Shanmukha%20Reddy,%20et%20al.pdf
37. dergipark.org.tr, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3662258
38. plantcelltechnology.com, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://plantcelltechnology.com/blogs/blog/blog-pros-and-cons-of-synthetic-seeds#:~:text=to%20traditional%20seeds.-,Disadvantages%20of%20synthetic%20seeds,the%20storage%20of%20synthetic%20seeds.
39. juniperpublishers.com, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://juniperpublishers.com/ijcsmb/pdf/IJCSMB.MS.ID.555583.pdf
40. Artificial Seeds (Principle, Aspects and Applications) – MDPI, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/7/4/71
41. Studying synthetic seeds and cryopreservation, Prof. Setiti …, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://unair.ac.id/studying-synthetic-seeds-and-cryopreservation-prof-setiti-inaugurated-as-professor-of-plant-embryology/
42. P a g e 420 Synthetic seeds: Production and applications in medicinal and aromatic plants – indian farmer, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://indianfarmer.net/uploads/Synthetic%20seeds.pdf
43. Synthetic Seed Production and Slow Growth Storage of In Vitro Cultured Plants of Iris pallida Lam. – MDPI, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/10/3/272
44. Synthetic Seed Technology for the Conservation of Medicinal Plants – ResearchGate, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386473927_Synthetic_Seed_Technology_for_the_Conservation_of_Medicinal_Plants
45. plantcelltechnology.com, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://plantcelltechnology.com/blogs/blog/blog-pros-and-cons-of-synthetic-seeds#:~:text=The%20cryopreserved%20synthetic%20seeds%20can,and%20produce%20environmentally%20friendly%20plantations.
46. Full article: Enhancing Germination and Growth of Chrysanthemum Synthetic Seeds Through Iron Oxide Nanoparticles and Indole-3-Acetic Acid: Impact of Treatment Duration on Metabolic Activity and Genetic Stability, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2147/NSA.S503868?src=
47. synthetic seed technology, application and future trends – ResearchGate, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369010549_SYNTHETIC_SEED_TECHNOLOGY_APPLICATION_AND_FUTURE_TRENDS
48. edis.ifas.ufl.edu, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/FA223#:~:text=Cryopreservation%20refers%20to%20the%20preservation,and%20cryogenic%20storage%20in%20perpetuity.
49. Cryopreservation and its clinical applications – PMC, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5395684/
50. Cryo-preservation of seeds | PPT – SlideShare, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/cryopreservation-of-seeds/233098154
51. Cryopreservation of Agronomic Plant Germplasm Using Vitrification-Based Methods: An Overview of Selected Case Studies, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8201202/
52. Concepts, History, Principles, and Application of Germplasm Cryopreservation Technology, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/FA223
53. Plant Cryopreservation: A Look at the Present and the Future – PMC, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8707037/
54. Cryopreservation of somatic embryos—An overview, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/bitstream/123456789/5629/1/IJBT%204(1)%2047-55.pdf
55. Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Freezing Tolerance in Plants: Implications for Cryopreservation – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11432106/
56. Induction of somatic embryogenesis and cryopreservation of Abies pinsapo Boiss., accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1535113/full
57. ENCAPSULATION-DEHYDRATION FOR CRYOPRESERVATION: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE | International Society for Horticultural Science, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.ishs.org/ishs-article/908_18
58. ARTIFICIAL SEED PRODUCTION AND CRYOPRESERVATION BY ENCAPSULATION DEHYDRATION FOR MEDICINAL HERB OF HIMALAYAN REGION, Swertia chirayita – Ingenta Connect, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cryo/cryo/2022/00000043/00000005/art00007?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf
59. Nanoparticles in Plant Cryopreservation: Effects on Genetic Stability, Metabolic Profiles, and Structural Integrity in Bleeding Heart (Papaveraceae) Cultivars, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.dovepress.com/nanoparticles-in-plant-cryopreservation-effects-on-genetic-stability-m-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-NSA
60. PRELIMINARY RESULTS ON DESICCATION AND PVS2-VITRIFICATION OF ‘CARRIZO’ CITRANGE SYNTHETIC SEEDS AS PRE-TREATMENTS TO CRYOPRESERVATION – Acta Horticulturae, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.actahort.org/books/892/892_38.htm
61. PRELIMINARY RESULTS ON DESICCATION AND PVS2-VITRIFICATION OF ‘CARRIZO’ CITRANGE SYNTHETIC SEEDS AS PRE-TREATMENTS TO CRYOPRESERVATION | International Society for Horticultural Science, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.ishs.org/ishs-article/892_38
62. Cryopreservation: Freezing Plant Tissues | Science Project, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-projects/project-ideas/PlantBio_p004/plant-biology/cryopreservation-freezing-plant-tissues
63. Chilling Out for Conservation – Crop Trust, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.croptrust.org/news-events/news/chilling-out-for-conservation/
64. Current status of the cryopreservation of embryogenic material of woody species – Frontiers, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1337152/full
65. (PDF) Cryopreservation of biological materials: applications and economic perspectives, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391059457_Cryopreservation_of_biological_materials_applications_and_economic_perspectives
66. www.researchgate.net, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337474945_Synthetic_Seeds_Prospects_and_Advances_in_Cryopreservation#:~:text=Synthetic%20seeds%2C%20in%20addition%20to,et%20al.%2C%202013).
67. More and Better Choices for Farmers – Agricultural Marketing Service – USDA, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/SeedsReport.pdf
68. Overcoming ice: cutting-edge materials and advanced strategies for effective cryopreservation of biosample – PubMed, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40050919/
69. Application of Multi-Omics Technologies to the Study of Phytochromes in Plants – MDPI, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/13/1/99
70. Genetic Enhancement of Plant Secondary Metabolites: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives – CORE, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://core.ac.uk/download/618257214.pdf
71. CRISPR-Cas9 Protein for Genome Editing—Getting Started Guide | Thermo Fisher Scientific, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/genome-editing/genome-editing-learning-center/genome-editing-resource-library/genome-editing-application-notes/crispr-cas9-protein-genome-editing-getting-started-guide.html
72. Recent advances in designing synthetic plant regulatory modules – PMC, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11999978/

Monsanto and Terminator Seeds – Open Case Studies at UBC, accessed on May 22, 2025, https://cases.open.ubc.ca/monsanto-and-terminator-seeds/